<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gnomercy Home Cinema and Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gnomercy.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gnomercy.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Help Support Practical Effects!</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/05/help-support-practical-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/05/help-support-practical-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crap I like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this kickstarter thing isn&#8217;t all that new, but it&#8217;s certainly gotten a lot of publicity lately with Hollywood folks getting involved and getting results. Cancelled shows are seeing fan-based resurgence. Stars, directors, writers, and all sorts of artists are turning to the Kickstarter method to avoid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this kickstarter thing isn&#8217;t all that new, but it&#8217;s certainly gotten a lot of publicity lately with Hollywood folks getting involved and getting results. Cancelled shows are seeing fan-based resurgence. Stars, directors, writers, and all sorts of artists are turning to the Kickstarter method to avoid having to water down their visions to win a studio green-light. It&#8217;s kind of nice, but it&#8217;s also worrisome that fans can&#8217;t get what the fans want. But this isn&#8217;t a post about the business of Hollywood. I&#8217;m a huge fan of practical effects films and I&#8217;ve talked to anyone who will listen about the need for a balance between CGI and practical. I think the Star Wars prequels is where I became firmly entrenched into this belief, but CGI has only become more common since then, and while the art form has gotten better, the bad CGI has gotten cheaper.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s a new project on Kickstarter that is the first I&#8217;ve felt compelled to support. <em><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1117671683/harbinger-down-a-practical-creature-fx-film">Harbinger Down</a></em> is a practical effects creature film that aims to be completely free from CGI and praise the old-school practical effects and it&#8217;s being created by the guys behind the effects in <em>Alien, Tremors, Terminator, Monster Squad</em>, and more. Check out their video. If you like practical effects and creature films like I do, this will probably be funded very quickly. One can hope.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1117671683/harbinger-down-a-practical-creature-fx-film/widget/video.html" frameborder="0" width="600" height="450"></iframe></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/05/help-support-practical-effects/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/05/help-support-practical-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Psycho with Huey and Al</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/american-psycho-with-huey-and-al/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/american-psycho-with-huey-and-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not very often Funny or Die is actually funny. But you throw enough crap in the wind and you eventually uncover&#8230;I don&#8217;t know where this metaphor is going. But watching Huey Lewis do his Christian Bale impression from American Psycho is pretty funny, mostly because it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not very often Funny or Die is actually funny. But you throw enough crap in the wind and you eventually uncover&#8230;I don&#8217;t know where this metaphor is going. But watching Huey Lewis do his Christian Bale impression from American Psycho is pretty funny, mostly because it mirrors the original scene so well. </p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.funnyordie.com/embed/e3662085fb" width="600" height="385" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<div style="text-align:left;font-size:x-small;margin-top:0;width:600px;"><a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e3662085fb/american-psycho-with-huey-lewis-and-weird-al" title="from Huey Lewis, Al Yankovic, PatB, NickCorirossi, Charles Ingram, JasonCarden, Ben Sheehan, and BoTown Sound">American Psycho with Huey Lewis and Weird Al</a> from <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/huey_lewis">Huey Lewis</a>      <iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?app_id=138711277798&amp;href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.funnyordie.com%2Fvideos%2Fe3662085fb%2Famerican-psycho-with-huey-lewis-and-weird-al&amp;send=false&amp;layout=button_count&amp;width=150&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:90px; height:21px; vertical-align:middle;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
</div>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/american-psycho-with-huey-and-al/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/american-psycho-with-huey-and-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything&#8217;s Coming up Jaws</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/everythings-coming-up-jaws/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/everythings-coming-up-jaws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t very long ago that I would tell people about how Steven Spielberg&#8217;s Jaws was my favorite movie and people thought I was joking. There was a long while that the mastery of Jaws was overshadowed and diluted by its crappy sequel brethren. But the last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/07.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[1275]" title="JAWS News!"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-542" title="JAWS News!" src="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/07-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>It wasn&#8217;t very long ago that I would tell people about how Steven Spielberg&#8217;s <em>Jaws</em> was my favorite movie and people thought I was joking. There was a long while that the mastery of <em>Jaws</em> was overshadowed and diluted by its crappy sequel brethren. But the last handful of years has seen a lot of love for <em>Jaws</em>, including Jawsfest, the feature length documentary The Shark is Still Working, and droves of filmmakers freely sharing their love for the film.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/jaws-selected-as-best-steven-spielberg-film-in-criticwire-poll?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Criticwire+%28Indiewire+Criticwire%29" target="_blank">Indiewire is now reporting</a> that <em>Jaws</em> is the best Spielberg movie of all time according to those who voted in their poll. Does that really mean anything? I&#8217;ll leave you on your own to answer that question, but I&#8217;m always happy when <em>Jaws</em> keeps being relevant. Check out the full article<a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/jaws-selected-as-best-steven-spielberg-film-in-criticwire-poll?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Criticwire+%28Indiewire+Criticwire%29" target="_blank"> here</a>.</p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/everythings-coming-up-jaws/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/04/everythings-coming-up-jaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film Site: Movies in Color</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/film-site-movies-in-color/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/film-site-movies-in-color/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize I see so many more things than I tend to share. Part of the purpose of starting this little web space was to highlight some interesting film related material that wasn&#8217;t like the movie news sites where you could get your rumor fix for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I see so many more things than I tend to share. Part of the purpose of starting this little web space was to highlight some interesting film related material that wasn&#8217;t like the movie news sites where you could get your rumor fix for the day. I like the art of films&#8230;the process, the things you don&#8217;t see or think about, the mistakes, thematic details that are often overlooked, and so much more. I&#8217;d like to do more with this website, like keep it updated often enough, which is probably beyond my current capacities. But I can at least share more of the things I&#8217;m looking at as a film fan and leave it at that. Right?</p>
<p>Color choices in film can often be very important to set the mood, keep in line with a certain theme, hint at dream or past sequences, or tell us what the characters are thinking or feeling. Not every detail in every shot is hand picked to match every intention, but it&#8217;s fun to think about and explore a bit. I stumbled upon a website called <a href="http://moviesincolor.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">Movies in Color</a> while I was looking for samples of Roger Deakins&#8217; cinematography. It&#8217;s a simple site that just takes a still from a film and analyzes the color palette. That&#8217;s it. I said it was simple. But it&#8217;s the good kind of simple. Below is an example, but if you&#8217;re interested at all, head over to the site and see what else there is.</p>
<h3>Site: <a href="http://moviesincolor.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">Movies In Color</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/tumblr_mjjcb8H2ZP1s6aghro1_1280.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[1270]" title="tumblr_mjjcb8H2ZP1s6aghro1_1280"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1271" title="tumblr_mjjcb8H2ZP1s6aghro1_1280" src="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/tumblr_mjjcb8H2ZP1s6aghro1_1280-600x362.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="362" /></a></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/film-site-movies-in-color/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/film-site-movies-in-color/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jurassic Park/Star Wars Mash-up</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/jurassic-parkstar-wars-mash-up/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/jurassic-parkstar-wars-mash-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching Han Solo say, &#8220;Clever girl&#8221; to an AT-AT is the highlight for me. But the whole thing is just good fun for us movie geeks. Take a look!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Han Solo say, &#8220;Clever girl&#8221; to an AT-AT is the highlight for me. But the whole thing is just good fun for us movie geeks. Take a look!</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="338" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/J7H8MszJ7u4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/jurassic-parkstar-wars-mash-up/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/03/jurassic-parkstar-wars-mash-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love Affair: Poltergeist</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/love-affair-poltergeist/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/love-affair-poltergeist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love Affair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having grown up partially in suburban California around the time Steven Spielberg was making it big, it&#8217;s easy to say I was somewhat shaped by his world. Spielberg is easily one of the best directors when it comes to children and accepting their viewpoints as completely valid, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/poltergeist_movie_ghost_doorway_tobe_hooper.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[1255]" title="poltergeist_movie_ghost_doorway_tobe_hooper"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1257" title="poltergeist_movie_ghost_doorway_tobe_hooper" src="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/poltergeist_movie_ghost_doorway_tobe_hooper-600x248.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="248" /></a>Having grown up partially in suburban California around the time Steven Spielberg was making it big, it&#8217;s easy to say I was somewhat shaped by his world. Spielberg is easily one of the best directors when it comes to children and accepting their viewpoints as completely valid, or in some cases, the whole basis for a movie. No matter what you may think about the man, he&#8217;s responsible for a whole lot of how the 80&#8242;s looked and felt. The films he produced and directed all had a signature feel to them, which was paid tribute to and successfully emulated most recently with <em>Super 8</em>. But there&#8217;s just something I connect with having been a young lad in the same suburban setting as <em>E.T.</em> and <em>Poltergeist</em> that I probably wouldn&#8217;t have if I was just a little older or younger. So it&#8217;s easy to admit that I have a biased love for some of these films which makes it a perfect topic for this edition of Love Affair.</p>
<p>I have no idea how old I was when I first watched Tobe Hooper&#8217;s <em>Poltergeist</em>. It&#8217;s likely my first horror film experience because it&#8217;s one of my earliest movie memories, along with ET. Perhaps my mother will chip in here&#8230;</p>
<p>Now that the film is over 30 years old, I&#8217;m surprised every time I watch it how much it holds up. Sure, the effects are dated, but by no means bad. The film hits all the right notes, and while it isn&#8217;t the scariest film around, it makes up for it with character, mood, and atmosphere. Instead of following the typical Love Affair outline, I&#8217;m just going to list, in no particular order, what I love about this film.</p>
<h4>1. Suburbia</h4>
<p>The setting is distinctly Spielberg. Seriously, some of the exterior shots of the neighborhood had me looking for Elliot on his bicycle. All the houses are the same. All the yards look alike. There are kids playing out in the street (I remember being one of those&#8230;), and there&#8217;s something both off-putting and a little comforting about the whole thing. Of course there is a message with all of this sameness, which is done to essentially save a buck, which begs the question; what else was compromised to save a few dollars?</p>
<p>But even without the whole morality tale bubbling at the surface, a kid like me could still understand that something isn&#8217;t quite right. It&#8217;s not just that your neighbor is so close that his remote is controlling your television. The most horrifying thing of all is that your family could be under assault from evil spirits and your neighbors won&#8217;t even know anything is going on. The close proximity paired with alienation is chilling.</p>
<h4>2. Initial Wonder</h4>
<p>The whole chair stacking sequence is great. Carrol Anne is bored with it by the time her father comes home, while mom Diane is having a blast watching some force move the chairs around, even using her own kid as a guinea pig (to her credit, she did strap a football helmet to her head). Of course she explains in detail to her husband how it feels to be moved by this force that she started playing with after breakfast and apparently taken up her whole day. Instead of being completely freaked out, they have a little fun with it. The adults are treated more like kids in this scene while Carrol Anne never really paid much attention. I absolutely love JoBeth William&#8217;s acting here; she was fun to watch and completely endearing. Her character was completely lost on me as a kid, which makes me so completely happy to be able to revisit films and find new things to love.</p>
<h4>3. Quick Acceptance</h4>
<p>So there&#8217;s an earthquake and a charred hole in the wall above the bed and your youngest child declares, &#8220;They&#8217;re here&#8221; in the middle of the night. This is a strange thing to wake up to, for sure, and Steve (Craig T. Nelson) is out asking questions about earthquakes the next day. It&#8217;s clear something strange has happened, but there&#8217;s nothing obvious enough yet to really think you&#8217;re in danger, right? But the next night, during another storm, a giant ass tree breaks through the bedroom glass and snags your son and tries to eat him. Both parents witness this and never question it. They don&#8217;t have time to. As soon as they&#8217;re back in the house, Carrol Ann is gone with the room&#8217;s belongings piled up against the closet like a black hole existed there momentarily. But then Carol Anne&#8217;s voice is heard through the television and we cut to Steve meeting with paranormal specialists (hobbyists, really). There is no dialog with the main character trying to come to grips with what&#8217;s going on. There&#8217;s no second doubts as Steve admits he had zero intentions of getting the police involved.</p>
<p>Modern films might assume that the audience wouldn&#8217;t be able to buy into the characters freely accepting what just happened. Think of most modern day television or film where something crazy happens and I bet there&#8217;s almost always someone there to act the skeptic. That shit kills me! How many times have I yelled at Scully for deliberately playing dumb in the <em>X-Files?</em> Unless you&#8217;re deliberately trying to set up a mystery, and the possibility of doubt is essential, don&#8217;t assume your audience can&#8217;t make the jump along with your characters. This is a film called Poltergeist, the audience is already primed. Thanks for not wasting our time.</p>
<h4>4. Zelda</h4>
<p>Freaky little Zelda Rubinstein. She may or may not have been critical to saving Carrol Anne, but she sure as hell screwed the pooch when she declared the house was clean. Regardless of her inability to fully do her job, she&#8217;s one crazy fun character who provided some great atmosphere. She delivers her lines perfectly and pulls you in to the moment. This is Poltergeist at its greatest, with Zelda whispering about the alternate planes of existence, and how Carrol Anne is a light in the darkness, but there&#8217;s another presence:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now hold on to yourselves&#8230; There&#8217;s one more thing. A terrible presence is in there with her. So much rage, so much betrayal, I&#8217;ve never sensed anything like it. I don&#8217;t know what hovers over this house, but it was strong enough to punch a hole into this world and take your daughter away from you. It keeps Carol Anne very close to it and away from the spectral light. It LIES to her, it tells her things only a child could understand. It has been using her to restrain the others. To her, it simply IS another child. To us, it is the BEAST.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right on, Zelda, right on.</p>
<h4>5. Go Into The Light</h4>
<p>This is one that got me with my most recent viewing. Go into the light is one of the better known quotes in the movie, and as a kid I remember being a little confused on whether the light was good or bad for Carrol Anne. Regardless, it was still effective because the idea that an expert like Tangina and a hobbyist like Dr. Lesh didn&#8217;t know anything for certain is terrifying. Can you imagine your daughter being sought after by some spirit beast and your only expert can only guess?</p>
<p>As an adult (even without kids) I have a whole new appreciation for the scene where Tangina is asking Steve to scold his daughter and then making Diane beg her daughter to head to the light, knowing that the light isn&#8217;t actually safe for Carrol Anne. Having to scold a child who is in great peril, your own child mind you, is incredibly hard to fathom. And then deceiving her into thinking the light was safe while knowing it is not is crazy. Again, I&#8217;m not a parent, but this to me was the emotional core of the film. I&#8217;ll admit I get choked up from time to time, I can be overly effected by melodrama, but this is the only time I can remember getting choked up during a horror film. This is certainly not my manliest moment, but this is one of the great powers of cinema, right? To feel emotion? I can totally feel the conflict in Steve and Diane in this scene, not to mention the anger towards Tangina and the powerlessness of not knowing what&#8217;s best for your own child. How awful a feeling that would be, and how totally effective it is in this film.</p>
<h4>6. 1982</h4>
<p>I&#8217;ve written before on the amazing run of films during the Summer of 1982, so I don&#8217;t need to rehash this except to say this is a great film in a season of great films. But this is also the 80&#8242;s, and while it&#8217;s early 80&#8242;s, it doesn&#8217;t feel like it&#8217;s shedding off the 70&#8242;s like some other films. This is quintessential 80&#8242;s through and through. Part of it is the pop culture references. Robbie has Yoda placed firmly next to his pillow with Darth Vader on his headboard and when he covers up the creepy clown, he does so with an image of Chewbacca. Not to mention C-3P0 is his light switch and his sheets are Star Wars. While it borders on exclusiveness, I remember having many of the same toys in my bedroom at this time.</p>
<p>Carrol Anne, in one of my favorite scenes, is chewing on a Luke Skywalker figuring while sliding her decapitated doll&#8217;s head back down toward its body. A little surreal, but somehow perfect for the time. There is an element of excess here. The kids have just about everything they want. When the pet bird dies, they immediately get fish. There are toys everywhere. The television is always on. Thematically, this goes hand in hand with the suburbanization element, but again, this is the 80&#8242;s without a doubt.</p>
<h4>7. Freakin&#8217; Trees!</h4>
<p>Tapping into one of those universal childhood fears; trees, and tree shadows, especially in a storm, can be scarier than anything. There is no rational reason to be scared of trees, but they do weird things in shadow form and sometimes they just look like they&#8217;re hiding Jason and his machete. Freaky conspiring trees.</p>
<h4>8. Freakin&#8217; Clowns!</h4>
<p>Maybe clowns are a horror cliche, but they&#8217;re a horror cliche for a reason. It works! Why the hell would Robbie have that clown in his room, anyway? I remember having things like that and I hid that shit in the closet! Not under the bed, in the closet! Only nice toys are allowed under the bed.</p>
<h4>9. The Directing Controversy</h4>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard the rumor that Spielberg is the real director of Poltergeist and that Tobe Hooper was more than a little pushed aside at some point during film making. Certain actors, like Zelda Rubinstein, have gone on record to say that Spielberg is the one who directed them. Spielberg himself, along with Tobe Hooper, have denied such a claim.</p>
<p>Regardless of who directed or how much, Spielberg is all over this film and without him I&#8217;m sure it would have been a mediocre horror flick. Not taking anything away from Tobe Hooper, who has proven himself to be pretty good in the horror movie business, but Poltergeist isn&#8217;t really his kind of material.</p>
<p>But if the rumors are true, if Tobe Hooper was just kind of along for the ride, the implications for Spielberg are huge! He would have had to direct two films simultaneously. That isn&#8217;t really an impossible feat, but it sure makes it sound unlikely. Still, when I look at <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/56267" target="_blank">this behind the scenes picture</a> taken during the filming of both E.T. and Poltergeist, I can&#8217;t help but smile and accept that it was Spielberg all the time. Just because I want it to be.</p>
<h4>10. Technology Horror Used to Work</h4>
<p>It&#8217;s funny to think of it now, but the analog snow on the television channel was once a sign of our increasing technology. Television and multiple channels were signs of the future! But this was made at a time when stations hadn&#8217;t yet committed to their broadcasts and didn&#8217;t actually program for 24 hours. See, kids? A history lesson! If Poltergeist were made today (and holy hell I hope the remake gets canned) it would feature the internet. Or maybe a cell phone. Or a roomba. That could actually be fun.</p>
<p>Regardless, tech horror doesn&#8217;t seem to work as well anymore without it seeming gimmicky. But Poltergeist, perhaps because it&#8217;s really pretty old or because I&#8217;m also old, doesn&#8217;t seem gimmicky at all. It&#8217;s also partly because the television wasn&#8217;t really dwelled upon in the film. Other than the family kicking their hotel room TV to the curb, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any real focus on the tech, and the paranormal hobbyists suggest the television is just a conduit. But the audience has generally seemed to relate the television to some sort of theme. How many times did I say &#8220;They&#8217;re here!&#8221; when there was any static on the television at all? Is Poltergeist a tech horror or not? I&#8217;m not sure I have a definitive answer.</p>
<h5>Bonus:</h5>
<p>As a fun little bonus, I got a nice laugh out of the forum thread on IMDB titled <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084516/board/nest/202236653?ref_=tt_bd_1http://" target="_blank">100 Things We Learned from Poltergeist</a>. These things almost always crack me up. Take a look if you get a chance.</p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/love-affair-poltergeist/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/love-affair-poltergeist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SNL Actually Funny with Djesus Uncrossed</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/snl-actually-funny-with-djesus-uncrossed/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/snl-actually-funny-with-djesus-uncrossed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often find SNL skits to sort of miss the mark, either starting with a great idea and not doing enough with it, or taking a bad idea and getting slightly more from it than should be possible. But their Tarantino revisionist history parody Djesus Uncrossed is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often find SNL skits to sort of miss the mark, either starting with a great idea and not doing enough with it, or taking a bad idea and getting slightly more from it than should be possible. But their Tarantino revisionist history parody Djesus Uncrossed is pretty great. Part of it is having Christoph Waltz (Django Unchained) playing Djesus. Take a look.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=n32896" frameborder="0" width="600" height="338"></iframe></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/snl-actually-funny-with-djesus-uncrossed/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/snl-actually-funny-with-djesus-uncrossed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Swan Frame by Frame Findings</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/black-swan-frame-by-frame-findings/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/black-swan-frame-by-frame-findings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t hide my love for Black Swan. Both Darren Aronofsky and Natalie Portman are two of my favorites working in Hollywood. I had so looked forward to Black Swan because I knew that a director like Aronofsky could get the most out of the under-utilized and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/black-swan-movie-wallpaper-1-903802.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[1244]" title="black-swan-movie-wallpaper-1-903802"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-733" title="black-swan-movie-wallpaper-1-903802" src="http://gnomercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/black-swan-movie-wallpaper-1-903802-600x450.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="450" /></a>I don&#8217;t hide my love for Black Swan. Both Darren Aronofsky and Natalie Portman are two of my favorites working in Hollywood. I had so looked forward to Black Swan because I knew that a director like Aronofsky could get the most out of the under-utilized and under-appreciated Natalie Portman (I would argue there is no better director active right now than perhaps the Coen brothers at getting fantastic, surprise performances out of actors than Aronofsky). I didn&#8217;t know how much I&#8217;d like the film but I ultimately fell for it head over heals. The attention to detail in the film completely sold me. That being said, I&#8217;ve underestimated just how detailed the film really was until a great little post at <a href="http://cinematiccorner.blogspot.com" target="_blank">Cinematic Corner</a> pulled out some screen shots of the film which highlighted some of these details. I had no idea the club scene was so packed with imagery. If you enjoyed this film at all or appreciate films that pay attention to small details, <a href="http://cinematiccorner.blogspot.com/2012/02/48-hidden-images-in-black-swan.html" target="_blank">check out the post</a> now!</p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/black-swan-frame-by-frame-findings/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/02/black-swan-frame-by-frame-findings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Hates Math</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/hollywood-hates-math/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/hollywood-hates-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll let you in on a little secret. Writing and maintaining this blog isn&#8217;t my full time job. Notice this hasn&#8217;t been updated lately but on the weekends. Professional bloggers don&#8217;t write on the weekends! My actual job is as an academic advisor. Clearly not related at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll let you in on a little secret. Writing and maintaining this blog isn&#8217;t my full time job. Notice this hasn&#8217;t been updated lately but on the weekends. Professional bloggers don&#8217;t write on the weekends! My actual job is as an academic advisor. Clearly not related at all to film. As an academic advisor, can you guess how many students tell me they&#8217;re bad at math or that math hates them? No other subject is capable of feelings like math. And math only has one feeling, it just feels it very intently.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m sharing secrets, here&#8217;s another one: I used to also think math hated me. And yet I now find myself advising science majors, training math tutors, and occasionally writing about movie math. Go figure. Things have a way of coming around if you give it long enough. But enough sharing of secrets, I have another video to present! It&#8217;s not mine. I found it through gizmodo.com and it&#8217;s called: Hollywood Hates Math.</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3uYBoWH3nFk?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="600" height="338"></iframe></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/hollywood-hates-math/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/hollywood-hates-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lego Cinema</title>
		<link>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/lego-cinema/</link>
		<comments>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/lego-cinema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FilmGeekery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnomercy.org/?p=1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always loved making models, and while I was never huge into legos, I&#8217;ve always enjoyed the endless possibilities a good lego set can provide. Lego has certainly been keeping itself modern by smartly partnering with Hollywood films, kid shows, and video games, and now they&#8217;ve caught [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always loved making models, and while I was never huge into legos, I&#8217;ve always enjoyed the endless possibilities a good lego set can provide. Lego has certainly been keeping itself modern by smartly partnering with Hollywood films, kid shows, and video games, and now they&#8217;ve caught my eye with a theater model. I was slightly intrigued by the premise, but knowing the inside is as detailed as the outside, complete with a projector and concession stand, well, they&#8217;ve done a nice job. Take a look at the video!</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CjG9nfY2nsk?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="600" height="338"></iframe></p>
<fb:like href='http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/lego-cinema/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gnomercy.org/2013/01/lego-cinema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
